Search Results for "promotion bar"

659 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 659 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal Against Clarification Order as Not Maintainable. Clarification Application Cannot Be Used to Re-argue Merits of the Case.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1865. The first appeal (LPA No. 663 of 2024) challenges an o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Forest Guards in Promotion Dispute — Circular Revocation Invalid Without Proper Rescission. State Government's Order Dated 14.05.2009 Did Not Revoke Earlier Circular of 17.10.1977; Subsequent Revocation Order Dated 11.06.2012 Was Not Given Retrospective Effect.

The case involves two appeals by Forest Guards, Omkar Sinha and another, against the State of Chhattisgarh and others, concerning their entitlement to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Probationary District Judge for Unsatisfactory Performance. Termination under Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 is valid and not stigmatic.

The petitioner, Smt. Smita Rajendra Kadu, was appointed as a District Judge (direct recruitment) under the Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...