WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 20304 OF 2019
25 Jul 2019The petitioners, engineering graduates from universities other than the University of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...
Search Results for "oral modification"
1191 result(s) found
Found 1191 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Challenging Departmental Enquiry Initiation Against Judicial Officer for Breach of CJI Guidelines. Court Examines Whether Enquiry Requires Written Complaint Supported by Affidavit Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1979.
4 May 2018The matter arose from two writ petitions filed by a Civil Judge Junior Division challenging orders dated 15-07-2016 by which the Registrar General of ...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lack of Title. Petitioners failed to prove ownership of the acquired land, and the acquisition was for a public purpose under the MRTP Act, 1966.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, claiming to be owners of certain lands in Kolhapur, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for road widening...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition and First Appeal Challenging Stop Work Notice and Revocation of Commencement Certificate for Public Parking Lot Construction; Considers Whether Deemed Permission Under Regulation 6(4) of DCR 1991 Was Obtained and Whether Natural Justice Was Violated. The Court Examines Legal Validity of Notice Issued Under Section 51 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, in Context of Completed Construction of 15 Upper Floors of PPL Based on Incentive FSI Under Clause 24 of Regulation 33.
27 Jan 2016The matter arose from construction activities undertaken by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited on Plot No.5B+6 at Worli, Mumbai, involving a high-...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12%. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach and damages are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Apr 2015The petitioner, Agarsons Container Terminals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeal in Arbitration Challenge Under National Highways Act — Upholds Partial Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Additional 10% Compensation. The Court held that Section 3-G(2) of the National Highways Act, 1956 does not permit additional 10% compensation for loss of easementary rights, and the Arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction.
20 Aug 2022The case involves an appeal by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and the Government of India against a judgment of the Principal Distric...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Revision Applications by Tenant and Landlord in Mesne Profits Dispute. Court Upholds Small Causes Court's Fixation of Mesne Profits and 9% Interest Rate Under Section 34 CPC.
10 Sep 2024The judgment involves cross civil revision applications filed by the tenant, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), and the landlord, M/s. Forbe...
- 501
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Attempted Robbery and House Trespass — Evidence of Injured Complainant and Son Found Credible. Concurrent findings of fact under Sections 393 and 452 IPC upheld as not perverse.
20 Nov 2006The applicant, Chandu @ Chandrakant Ramkrishna Pawar, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.5, Amravati in Regular Criminal C...
- 156
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Closure of Byculla Zoo for Failing to Meet Modern Standards of Animal Welfare and Conservation. Zoo's antiquated conditions violate fundamental duty of compassion under Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution and provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
18 Jul 2005The Bombay High Court delivered an oral judgment on July 18, 2005, in a public interest litigation filed by People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (P...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.
17 Oct 2005The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...
- 49
