Search Results for "misconceived"

2472 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2472 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Reinstatement Based on Post-Retirement Government Resolutions. Government Resolutions enhancing superannuation age from 58 to 60 years, issued after petitioner's retirement, cannot be applied retrospectively to reinstate a retired employee.

The petitioner, Assanchand Jain, was a Lecturer in the Electrical Engineering Department at Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI). He attain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by NGOs Challenging Revocation of Allotment of Gymnasium Centres by MCGM — No Right to Continue in Possession After Expiry of Licence Period

The Appellants, two NGOs, were allotted Gymnasium Centres by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on caretaker basis for fixed periods. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Disability Pension Arrears for Ex-Serviceman from 1995 to 2014. Denial of disability pension to a former soldier for the period between 1995 and 2014 was held misconceived as the disability was later assessed at 20% permanently, entitling him to arrears.

The appellant, Madan Prasad Sinha @ Sanatan Baba, was enrolled in the Indian Army's Corps of Signals as a Radio Mechanic on 18 February 1971. He was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Order Granting Leave to Lead Secondary Evidence. Court Holds That Leave to Lead Secondary Evidence Is Unnecessary and Misconceived Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The petitioner, defendant no.6 in Regular Civil Suit No. 689 of 2009, challenged an order passed by the trial court granting leave to the plaintiff to...