Search Results for "long term capital loss"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "long term capital loss"

397 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Loan vs. Capital Contribution and Rejection of Counterclaim as Not Maintainable. The court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 failed.

23 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Shekhar Appu Shetty, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bonus Calculation Dispute Involving Subsidiary Company. Service Fee Payment Under Technical Aid Agreement Held to Be Legitimate Expenditure, and Deduction of Bonus as Prior Charge Before Depreciation and Tax Ruled Improper Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

6 May 1959

The dispute arose out of a claim for bonus by the workmen of Crompton Parkinson (Works) Private Ltd., Bombay, which was initially a wholly-owned subsi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

18 Jul 2018

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.

31 Mar 2006

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award Granting Permanency to Compassionate Appointees of Air India Ltd. — Record Note Does Not Confer Right to Permanency. The Court held that compassionate appointments under the Record Note dated 26 March 1992 were contractual and did not create a right to permanency, and that the Tribunal erred in directing permanency with full backwages without considering the terms of the Record Note or the financial condition of the employer.

24 Jan 2024

The case involves a writ petition filed by Air India Ltd. (AIL) challenging an Award dated 6 March 2018 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Amalgamation Scheme of PMC Bank Under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Fundamental Rights or Procedural Irregularities; Scheme Upheld as Serving Public Interest and Depositor Protection.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment deals with seven writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 25 January 2022 issued by the Ministr...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Commercial Loan Matter; Bank's Prudential Decision Upheld. Court rules that the communication of a commercial bank rejecting a borrower's request under a credit guarantee scheme does not attract the strict requirement of reasons applicable to statutory authorities, and the scope of judicial review under Article 226 is limited to cases of statutory violation, unfairness, or mala fides.

4 Oct 2021

The first petitioner, Traegen Systems Private Limited, an MSME enterprise engaged in the business of musical instruments and audio equipment, availed ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

20 Aug 2015

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case for Lack of Inquiry by Assessing Officer. Revision under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961, sustained as Assessing Officer failed to examine revenue reconciliation and reimbursement of expenses, making assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue.

19 Jun 2026

The appellant-assessee, Mirum Digital Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in digital marketing and buys media space from online platforms like LinkedIn, Google, etc...

High Court

Writ Appeals Filed by Tea and Coffee Plantation Companies Against Denial of Input Tax Credit on Cultivation Inputs under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Issue: Whether Cultivation Inputs Eligible for Tax Credit Under Section 10(2) Read with Section 2(6) and 2(19) of the Act.

28 Feb 2014

The appeals arose from reassessment orders passed under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, denying input tax credit to tea and coffee plantation...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)