Search Results for "irreparable loss"

1116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction Order in Property Dispute Between Brothers. Court upholds trial court's discretion in granting temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, finding no perversity or jurisdictional error.

The petitioners, original defendants in a civil suit, challenged the order dated 2nd May 2017 passed by the District Judge-2, Niphad, dismissing their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Dispute Over Property Rights and Possession. Court Holds That Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Application Under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Without Proper Application of Mind and Without Considering Prima Facie Case.

The revision application was filed by the applicants (original plaintiffs) challenging the order dated 23.11.2017 passed by the trial court dismissing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Favor of Tenant in Land Dispute with Agricultural Corporation. The court restored the trial court's interim injunction protecting the petitioner's possession based on prima facie tenancy rights and balance of convenience.

The petitioner, Baliram Dagadu Mundfane, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case, Restrains Defendants from Selling Allegedly Copied Books. Court finds prima facie case of substantial copying of plaintiff's literary works on Indian Economy and Polity by former students.

The appellant, Ranjan Vasudeo Kolambe, filed a Commercial Appeal From Order under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trade Mark Infringement Case — Continuous Prior Use Not Established by Respondent. Section 34 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 requires continuous use from a date prior to registration; gap in evidence of use after 2013 defeats claim of prior user.

The appellant, Leben Life Science Private Limited, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, Jarun Pharmaceuticals Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction in Family Property Dispute. Court holds that properties brought into partnership become partnership assets, not joint family property, and appellants failed to establish prima facie case for injunction.

The dispute in this case arises between family members over properties originally owned by Ganpat Sutar. The appellants, who are the widow and childre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Court Receiver in Partnership Dispute. Appointment of Receiver Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion Under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC in a Suit for Dissolution of Partnership.

The petitioners, who were defendants in a suit for dissolution of partnership and accounts, challenged the appointment of a Court Receiver over the pa...