Search Results for "government land encroachment"

660 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 660 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Upholding Plaintiff's Title Over Wakf Property. The court held that the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the suit and that the plaintiff's suit was not barred by limitation.

The case involves a dispute over Survey Gut No.66 of village Harsool, Aurangabad. The plaintiff, Pratapsingh s/o Nursing Kakarwal, filed a suit before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Leasing Government Land to Society Where He Was President and Trustee. Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Indirect Interest in Contract Leads to Disqualification.

The petitioner, a resident and voter of Village Waghunde (Khurd), filed an application under Section 14(g) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Textile Mill Land Sale. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel conclusion of sale after tender was cancelled due to non-compliance with terms.

The petitioner, M/s Drushti Engineers & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Alleging Construction Encroached on Open Space. Construction Permitted in Plot No. 78 as Per Sub-Division Plan, No Encroachment Found on Examination of Distances and Plans.

Two writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging development permission granted to private respondents for constructio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...