Search Results for "final scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "final scheme"

5795 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5795 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

23 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Section 32(3) of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Deputy Director Lacked Jurisdiction to Reopen Final Consolidation Scheme After 30 Years. The court held that once a certificate under Section 22 is issued, the scheme attains finality and cannot be reopened under Section 32(3) except for clerical errors.

13 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Padmabai Narayan Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Au...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sales Tax Incentive Scheme Withdrawal — No Promissory Estoppel Against Policy Change in Public Interest. The court held that the withdrawal of a general sales tax incentive scheme by the State Government was valid and not violative of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by industrial units (M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd., M/s. Chandrapur Vidyut Conductors Private Ltd....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

29 Apr 2024

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

30 Nov 2022

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Town Planning Dispute Over Demolition Notices. Notices Under Sections 78 and 79 of Bombay Town Planning Act Held Valid Against Alleged Unauthorized Construction.

6 May 2005

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay against the judgment of a Single Judge in First Appeal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

1 Jan 1970

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Consolidation Scheme Under Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Application Filed After 44 Years Held Barred by Limitation. Power Under Section 32 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Ordinarily Not Beyond Three Years; Earlier Objections Do Not Cure Delay.

9 Oct 2017

The dispute pertained to the reopening of a consolidation scheme for agricultural lands in village Kasba Aalte, taluka Hatkanangale, district Kolhapur...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)