Search Results for "family requirement"

3971 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3971 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Complaint Under National Housing Bank Act. High Court's Quashing of Complaint Against Company Directors Overturned; Case to Proceed Against Managing Director and Company

The appellant filed a complaint alleging a violation of Section 29A of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987. The Magistrate took cognizance of the comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Challenge to Stamp Duty and Penalty Order in Specific Performance Suit. Agreement of Sale with Possession Deemed Conveyance Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and Court Has No Discretion to Impose Lesser Penalty Than Ten Times Deficit Duty Under Section 34.

The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 04.11.1996, which was coupled with possession, thereby deemed a con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against De-Freezing of Bank Accounts in Seizure Case Under Section 102(3) CrPC — Delayed Reporting to Magistrate Does Not Vitiate Seizure Order; Requirement is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the first informant in Crime No.318 of 2022 against an order of the Madras High Court dated 09.08.2023, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...