Search Results for "duty paid"

6712 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6712 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRT's Power to Impound Unstamped Memorandum of Entry Under Bombay Stamp Act — Instrument Executed Outside State but Produced in Evidence Before Tribunal Properly Impounded.

The petitioner, M/s. WinnQuiz Company Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 16 August 2010. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Refund of Excess Stamp Duty Paid by Company in Stamp Duty Refund Case — Respondents Directed to Refund Rs.10,11,810/- with Interest. Petitioner Entitled to Refund Under Section 48 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 as Claim Was Within Limitation and Excess Payment Admitted.

The petitioner, Dalmiya Cement Venture Limited, a public limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, got registered several lands...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application in Out-of-State Contract Dispute. Holds That Arbitration Is Not a 'Thing Done' Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and Contract Executed and Performed Outside Maharashtra Is Not Liable to Stamp Duty in Maharashtra.

The applicant, S Satyanarayana & Co, a partnership firm based in Visakhapatnam, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...