WRIT PETITION NO. 12656 OF 2023
8 Apr 2025The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. against the order dated 31 July ...
Search Results for "district consumer commission"
438 result(s) found
Found 438 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Caste Validity Certificate and Rejection of Nomination in Lok Sabha Elections — Caste Scrutiny Committee Lacks Power of Review Under Section 7 of Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. The Court held that a validity certificate issued under Section 6 of the Act cannot be cancelled by the Committee without express statutory authority and without following principles of natural justice.
24 Sep 2024The petitioner, Rashmi Barve, a Zilla Parishad member, had obtained a caste validity certificate dated 17/02/2020 from the District Caste Certificate ...
- 2772
High Court
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Invalid Investigation by Assistant Commissioner of Police. Investigation by officer not of rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police violates Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, leading to quashing of FIR and proceedings.
13 Mar 2019The petitioners, Sarvesh Kumar Shahi and Samiresh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the initiation of proceedings ...
- 89
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission Order on Wheeling and Banking Charges for Renewable Energy Generators. The court examined the validity of the order dated 14.05.2018 under the Electricity Act, 2003.
13 Mar 2019A batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several renewable en...
- 91
Tribunals
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in PMJJBY Claim Dispute — Insurance Company Cannot Repudiate Claim After Issuing Policy Without Verifying Eligibility. The Commission held that the insurer's failure to verify age before issuing the certificate bars subsequent repudiation on that ground.
22 Jul 2025The case arises from a dispute under the Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY), a government-sponsored life insurance scheme. The complaina...
- 265
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.
9 Dec 2022The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...
- 240
Tribunals
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal by Insurance Company in Ex-Parte Case — No Insurance Policy Ever Issued to Complainant. The appellant insurance company was placed ex-parte before the District Forum and never informed of the proceedings; the Commission set aside the orders against the appellant as no policy was ever issued.
5 May 2025The case involves a second appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) filed by Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (the...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Site Allotment by Mysore Urban Development Authority — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Any Legal Right or Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. The Court Held That the Allotment Process Was Conducted in Accordance with the Applicable Rules and Regulations, and No Interference Was Warranted Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
31 Oct 2023The petitioner, C.N. Balasubramanyam, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...
- 120
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.
30 Jun 2025The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...
- 283
