Search Results for "distributor"

206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Partition Suit — Liberal Approach to Amendment Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. The court set aside the trial court's rejection of amendment application, holding that amendments should be liberally allowed to determine the real controversy.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit (O.S. No. 3/2021) pending before the Senior Civil Judge at Ankola, filed an application (I.A. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Retailers in Insecticide Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The petitioners, Devanand and Basanagouda Mali Patil, were accused Nos. 1 and 2 in CC No. 688/2022 pending before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Shahapur, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Octroi Levy on Concentrate Used in Carbonated Beverages. Court Holds That Concentrate Is Not 'Sweetened Aerated Water' Under Entry 60 of Schedule H of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited, is a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of carbonated beverages. It imports a concent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Modvat Credit in Central Excise Case Due to Lockout Causing Delay in Receipt of Goods. Notification dated 30.3.1994 restricting credit after 30.6.1994 for gate passes issued before 1.4.1994 held inapplicable where delay was due to lockout, a force majeure event.

The petitioners, N R C Limited and Mr. Ashokan A., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Notification dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in LPG Dealership Dispute — Termination Upheld as Valid. Arbitrator's findings on breach of agreement clauses and quantification of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Ms. Anila Gautam Jain, proprietress of M/s. Badal Agency, was appointed as a dealer by the Respondent, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...