Search Results for "compromise behind back"

337 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 337 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Megha Lok Adalat Decree in Property Suit — Petitioner Not a Party to Compromise. Decree Passed Without Jurisdiction as Dispute Was Not Referable to Lok Adalat Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, Kishore Baldev Bajaj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a decree dated 25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Illegal Construction by Builder with Political Connections. Court Quashes Regularisation Orders and Directs Demolition of Unauthorised Structures in Old Goa.

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of buildings by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Circle Officer's Application Under Section 482 CrPC to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Mutation Dispute — Sanction Required Under Section 197 CrPC for Official Acts. Revisional Court's Order Set Aside as It Failed to Consider That Mutation Entry Is Part of Official Duty.

The petitioner, Gautam Kashiram Puri, a Circle Officer, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 ...