WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019
20 Nov 2019The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....
Search Results for "collusive"
342 result(s) found
Found 342 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Validity — Oral Statements Not Sufficient to Transfer Ownership Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Sale Deed Executed During Pendency of Appeal Remains Valid and Not Affected by Subsequent Dismissal of Suit.
15 Jul 2024The case involves a property dispute arising from two rounds of litigation. In the first round, Mansha Ram and others (plaintiffs) filed a suit for de...
- 428
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Waiver of Six-Month Waiting Period Under Section 13B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act in Mutual Consent Divorce Case. Court Holds That Statutory Cooling Period Is Directory and Can Be Waived When Marriage Has Irretrievably Broken Down and Parties Have Been Separated for Over One Year.
13 Dec 2021The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had upheld the Family Court's refusal to waive the...
- 1634
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.
12 Mar 2014The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...
- 146
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Amendment Application in Partition Suit — Holds That Adding Property and Changing Valuation Does Not Alter Nature of Suit. Amendment Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Must Be Liberally Granted to Determine Real Controversy Between Parties.
17 Feb 2026The present petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India were filed by the original plaintiffs (petitioners) challenging the orde...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Regular First Appeal Challenging Decree Holding Sale Deeds Void Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act in Pending Partition Suit. Appeal contests application of lis pendens doctrine to nullify purchases made during pendency of suit, with court's analysis focusing on extent of co-heir rights in Mohammedan law.
31 Jan 2015The case arose from a partition suit filed by two Muslim women, Smt. Jameela Begum and Smt. Iqbal Begum, seeking their shares in the properties left b...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell Land Due to Lack of Proof of Readiness and Willingness and Failure to Prove Agreement. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the execution of the agreement and his readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract, and the suit was barred by limitation.
29 Oct 2013The appellant, Kanhaiyalal Motilal Talera, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 28-03-1979, allegedly executed by Sarub...
- 132
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Application of Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC to Suit by Non‑Party Seeking Declaration That Compromise Decree is Not Binding. The appellant, a religious math, challenged the rejection of its plaint which alleged that a compromise decree was fraudulent and collusive, thus not binding on it.
18 Mar 2025The dispute centered on a property originally allotted to S. Narayana by the Bengaluru Development Authority in 1973, with a sale deed executed in 199...
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Finding of Waiver of Right to Object to Time Extension in Arbitration Proceedings. Held that Participation in Proceedings Without Insisting on Time Limit Constitutes Waiver of Right to Object to Extension of Time.
27 Aug 2019The appeal arises from a dispute between partners of a partnership firm (appellants) and a company (respondent) regarding an arbitration agreement dat...
- 246
High Court
High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act.
6 Apr 2026These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 ...
- 31
