Search Results for "carry forward loss"

366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition for Interim Relief and Arbitrator Appointment in Redevelopment Dispute -- Section 9 and Section 11 of Arbitration Act Applications Denied

The High Court dismissed both petitions filed by Petitioner against Respondents -- The Petitioner sought interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2007-2008. Failure to Assess Consideration Under Distribution Agreement Constitutes Income Escaping Assessment.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It entered into a Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Airbag Non-Deployment Case. Non-Disclosure of Airbag Deployment Threshold Constitutes Unfair Trade Practice Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by Shailendra Bhatnagar against Hyundai Motor India Limited regarding non-deployment of airbags in hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...