Search Results for "attachment orders"

665 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 665 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SAFEMA Notice Against Family Members of Convicted NDPS Offender. Property Attachment Under SAFEMA Sections 68A-68I Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome.

The petitioners, Zaibunissa Ebrahim Khan, Junaid Ebrahim Khan, Faizal Ebrahim Khan, Imran Ebrahim Khan, and Afzal Ebrahim Khan, are family members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Implementation of Cow Slaughter Ban and Cattle Protection Laws — Court Finds No Violation of Statutory Provisions and Declines to Issue Mandamus.

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Registrar General of the High Court of Karnataka seeking directi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Garnishee Order Against Respondent in Execution of Decree — Debt Acknowledged in Balance Sheets Constitutes Admission of Liability. The Court directed attachment and deposit of Rs. 17,40,82,984/- under Order XXI Rules 46 and 46A CPC, finding no real dispute under Rule 46-C.

The Applicant, Drive India Enterprises Solutions Ltd., is the Judgment Creditor in a decree dated 10th September 2018 against the Judgment Debtor, Hai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — Decree Not Null and Void Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That a Consent Decree Can Be Executed Even If It Contains Terms Beyond the Suit, Provided Parties Freely Consented.

The case arises from a commercial suit (Suit No. 119 of 2016) filed by Mahesh P. Raheja, Preeti P. Raheja, and Shakuntala P. Raheja (Respondent Nos. 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Tax Recovery Officer in Income Tax Recovery Matter — Notices Under Section 226(3) Upheld. General Power of Attorney Does Not Confer Ownership of Bank Accounts, and Attachment Notices to Banks Are Valid Against the Account Holder.

The case involves an appeal by the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of a Single Judge of the Karnataka H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Objection to Execution of Decree Based on Jurisdictional Challenge Under Section 39(4) CPC. Court Holds That Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Execution by the Court That Passed the Decree When the Property Is Situated Outside Its Local Limits.

The present chamber summons arose out of a suit filed by ICICI Ltd, as Debenture Trustees, against Kothri Industrial Corporation Ltd and others for re...