Search Results for "allottee rights"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Agreement of Transfer and Re-conveyance Clause Requires Trial. Order VII Rule 11 CPC plaint rejection set aside as suit raises triable issues regarding clause 10 of 1957 agreement and plaintiff's transferee rights.

The appellant, Satish Talakchand Shah, filed a civil suit (Civil Suit No. 1708 of 2010) in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking declaration of owners...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Cancellation of Shack Allotment for Violation of Natural Justice. Director of Tourism's Orders Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Grounds and No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

The petitioners, Alex J. Fernandes and Agustinho Coutinho, were allotted shacks at Umtawado, Calangute, Goa under the Tourism Policy 2016-2019 after a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Appeals Challenging Sale Deeds Executed in Favor of Members. Arbitrator under Delhi Cooperative Societies Act lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate validity of registered sale deeds, which can only be challenged before civil court.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Delhi Dayalbagh Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. against the orders of the Delhi High Court, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against SSRD Orders in Land Regularization Case. SSRD's Directions for Regularization Based on Auction Price Upheld as Within Jurisdiction Under Rule 108(6) of Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972.

The dispute originated from the allotment of government land in 1967 to M/s. Nav Bharat Potteries Ltd. for a pottery industry at a concessional rate, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Occupancy Class-II to Class-I Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Holds That Section 44 of the Code Does Not Bar Such Conversion for Lands Acquired Under Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ananta Landmarks Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/communicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...