Search Results for "agricultural land ceiling"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "agricultural land ceiling"

274 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Reforms Act Matter — Upholds Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights. The Court held that the Land Tribunal's findings of fact regarding cultivation and tenancy are final and not subject to interference under writ jurisdiction unless perverse or based on no evidence.

28 May 2025

The case pertains to a dispute over occupancy rights in agricultural land under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The appellants, who are legal re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Lease Created After Tillers' Day Not Subject to Purchase Obligation Under Sections 32-O and 32-P of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlord's Claim for Restoration After 32 Years Held Time-Barred and Without Termination of Tenancy.

9 Feb 2024

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original tenant, challenged the orders of the Tahsildar and the appellate authority directing eviction and restora...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case, Upholding Government Possession and Compensation Under Statutory Procedure. Land Declared Surplus Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act 1976, with Possession Taken in 1987 and Compensation Paid in 1988, as Tribunal Findings Attained Finality and No Deemed Possession Arose from Unrelated Remand Order.

5 Sep 2022

The dispute involved an appeal by the legal representatives of a landowner against the State of Gujarat regarding surplus agricultural land under the ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Public Interest Litigation Against Tree-Planting Fund Collection — Cauvery Calling Project Not Found to Be Collecting Funds Illegally or Without Government Oversight. Court Finds No Illegal Fund Collection or Activity on Government Land, Holds State Already Monitoring the Project.

7 Sep 2021

The present writ petition was filed as a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, by a practicing advocate,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Land Transfer Without Previous Sanction Under Section 43 of Bombay Tenancy Act. Post-transfer sanction cannot regularize invalid transfer; MRT order set aside.

5 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Saraswati Shamrao Dhere, was a tenant of half portion of agricultural land in Shiroli, Kolhapur. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were ten...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.

19 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Revision After 15 Years Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Anurat Jadhav, a resident of Salimba, filed a return under Section 12 of the Ceiling Act on 1 December 1975, showing total holding of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo Moto Inquiry Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction as Land Was Already Determined Surplus and Acquired. Delay of 18 years in issuing notice under Section 17 renders the inquiry invalid and without jurisdiction.

9 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Raghvendra Yeshwantrao Deshmukh, a resident of Belkund, Taluka Ausa, District Latur, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act — Notice Issued After 17 Years Quashed for Being Beyond Limitation Period. The court held that the Additional Commissioner must initiate suo moto enquiry within 3 years from the date of the original order, and failure to do so renders the notice without jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Pandit Dnyanoba Gawali, as legal heir of deceased Dnyanoba Ramkrishnarao Gawali, challenged a notice dated 03.09.1992 issued by the Ad...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)