Search Results for "advocate duty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "advocate duty"

10185 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10185 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).

29 Jan 2024

The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Reopening Beyond Four Years Requires Specific Disclosure Failure. General Statement of Non-Disclosure Not Sufficient Under Proviso to Section 147 Income Tax Act, 1961.

30 Sep 2021

The petitioner, a real estate developer, challenged a notice dated 27/03/2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Circulars Including Dealer's PDI and Free After-Sales Service Costs in Assessable Value of Vehicles — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

7 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of vehicles, challenged clause 7 of Circular No. 643/34/2002CX dated 1st July, 2002 and Circular...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Interest Demand on Bonded Goods Under Customs Act. Interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 is Mandatory and Not Waivable Even for Delays Caused by Customs Authorities.

3 Apr 2006

The petitioners, M/s SBEC Sugar Limited and its shareholder S.S. Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Correctly Held Commissioner Not Justified Under Section 263 for Alleged Double Deduction of Excise Duty. Assessing Officer Followed Permissible View and Assessee Did Not Claim Deduction Twice.

16 Jun 2016

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (I...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR Against School Authorities Accused Under POCSO Act. Court Holds that Statutory Duty to Report Child Sexual Abuse Overrides Institutional Silence and Upholds Investigation for Failure to Report Under Section 21.

2 Jul 2026

The judgment arises from a criminal petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR registe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows KSFC's Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Recall Witnesses for Cross-Examination in Suit for Specific Performance. Court Holds That Right to Cross-Examine Is a Valuable Right and Denial Thereof Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC.

5 Mar 2015

The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 2.12.2013 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Ju...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Appellants' Application Under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 CPC Rejected by Executing Court Set Aside. Court Holds That Executing Court Must Determine Rights of Third Parties Claiming Independent Possession Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC Before Confirming Sale.

19 Sep 2022

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the legal heirs of the original judgment-debtor, Hiranappa (since deceased), and other family...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Defendant's Challenge to Stamp Duty on Sale Agreements — Recital of Possession Handed Over Attracts Conveyance Duty Under Article 5(e)(i) of Karnataka Stamp Act. Possession Delivered Under Agreement to Sell Attracts Same Duty as Conveyance Even if Purchaser Already in Possession.

9 Oct 2020

The writ petition arose from an interlocutory order in O.S. No.17/1999, a suit for declaration that two sale agreements dated 30.03.1996 were concocte...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)