Search Results for "Tamil Nadu Amendment"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Appeals Against Convictions in Honour Killing Case Involving Inter-Caste Marriage. Multiple Accused Challenged Convictions Under Sections 302/149 IPC and SC/ST Act Provisions for Murder and Atrocities Against Dalit Victim.

The Supreme Court considered appeals challenging the Madras High Court's judgment dated 08.06.2022, which had modified convictions and sentences in a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case — Detention Order Quashed Due to Lack of Public Order Threat. Preventive detention under Act 14 of 1982 set aside as ordinary law sufficient for Prohibition Act offences.

The petitioner, V. Jayalakshmi, wife of the detenu Venkatesan, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...