Search Results for "Statutory Provisions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Statutory Provisions"

13442 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13442 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation and Betterment Charges for CIDCO Metro Project. Court upholds compensation determined under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and rejects waiver of betterment charges under CIDCO Act.

4 Mar 2025

The judgment pertains to a group of five writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Metro Centre project of CIDCO in Panvel,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Advisory Opinion Addresses Scope of Governor's and President's Powers Over State Legislation under Articles 200 and 201. Presidential Reference Seeks Clarity on Constitutional Discretion, Time Limits, and Justiciability in Light of Conflicting Judgments.

1 Jan 1970

The President of India, exercising powers under Article 143(1) of the Constitution, referred fourteen questions to the Supreme Court on 13th May 2025,...

High Court

KAHC010480352008_1

10 Aug 2018

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dissents That Designated Court Under MCOC Act Cannot Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Without Prior Sanction. Special Court Not a Magistrate and Section 23(1) Bar Overrides Private Complaint Procedure.

22 Dec 2005

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions involving a common legal question: whether a designated court under the Maharashtra Control of O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Non-Compliance with Notice Requirements Under Section 13(2) and 13(4) of SARFAESI Act Renders Sale Invalid. DRT and DRAT Orders Upheld, Bank Directed to Follow Statutory Procedure Before Re-auction.

22 Jun 2023

The petitioners, Akola Janata Commercial Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its Branch Manager/Authorised Officer, challenged the judgment of the Debt Recover...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Company Applications for Recall of Attachment and Leave to Sell Property in Winding-Up of BPL Engineering Limited. Issues Raised Include Whether SARFAESI Act Overrides Tax Department's Statutory First Charge under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act.

2 Jul 2026

The matter pertained to competing claims over an immovable property of BPL Engineering Limited (in liquidation), situated at Pashamylaram Village, San...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Addresses Requirement of Leave Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Applicability of IBC Moratorium in Admiralty Proceedings. Court Considers Whether Admiralty Suits Are Affected by Company Liquidation Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Moratorium Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Light of Competing Claims of Maritime Creditors and Operation of Insolvency Law.

19 May 2020

The proceedings arose from multiple admiralty suits filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, wherein orders of arrest of defendant vessels...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)