Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

2509 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2509 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Compromise. Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC exercised to quash non-compoundable offence where parties settled amicably and no public interest involved.

The applicant, Prashant @ Tushar Lalchand Bhamre, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Case: Ownership Dispute in Summary Proceedings Under U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Article 227 by Reappreciating Evidence on Ownership and Bonafide Need.

The appellant, Santosh Chaturvedi, filed a petition under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Implement Award and Settlement Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Tata Yazaki Autocomp Ltd., a company manufacturing wire harness for the automobile sector employing around 500 permanent workmen in Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Lok Adalat Order in Writ Petition Due to Jurisdictional Overreach Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Lok Adalat Lacks Authority to Decide Cases on Merits When No Settlement is Reached, Must Return Case to Referring Court as Per Sections 19(5) and 20(5) of the Act.

The dispute arose from an order dated 30.11.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, in Writ Petition No. 8074 of 2011, where...