Search Results for "Service Rules Relaxation"

367 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Employees Without Hearing. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without opportunity of hearing and at fag-end of service is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, employees of the respondent-Corporation, were promoted and granted stepping up of pay in 1996. In 2012, the Corporation sought to rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employees Against Recovery Orders in Service Law Case Due to Lack of Hearing and Erroneous Employer Interpretation. Recovery of Excess Payments After Retirement Held Illegal as No Misrepresentation by Employees and Based on Equity Principles to Prevent Hardship.

The dispute involved retired stenographers who had been granted financial benefits in 2017 based on the Shetty Commission recommendations, which were ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Bidders to Be from SC/ST Community. Condition Held Valid as Affirmative Action for Upliftment of SC/ST Communities, Not Violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, eleven pump manufacturing companies, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a tend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute — Date of Appointment Prevails Over Year of Vacancy. Promotees appointed on 01.03.2007 are senior to direct recruits appointed on 14.08.2007 and 24.11.2007 under the Manipur Police Service Rules, 1965.

The case involves an inter-se seniority dispute between promotees and direct recruits in the Manipur Police Service Grade II Officers Cadre. The promo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Teacher Challenging Termination in MEPS Rules Case — Appointment on Year-to-Year Basis Not Confirmed. Probationary teacher's termination upheld as approval was extended only till 30.04.1995 under Schedule B of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, Smt. Geeta Khandwekar, was appointed as a teacher in a private school managed by the Bharat Education Society. She was appointed initi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Promotions of Assistant Engineers. Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules and Without MPSC Consultation Were Held Illegal.

The case involves multiple writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 11.9.2003 in Original Application ...