Search Results for "Railway accident compensation"

347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal, Upholds Compensation to Parents of Deceased Passenger in Untoward Incident. Deceased Presumed Bona Fide Passenger Under Section 113 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, as Railway Failed to Rebut Presumption.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against an award of the Railway Accide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Falling from Crowded Train is Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Parents Held to be Dependants Entitled to Compensation Despite Lack of Documentary Proof.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Alpesh Arun Dhotre, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal after their son died whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal in Compensation Claim for Untoward Incident Death. Claimants' Failure to Prove Bona Fide Passenger Status Not Fatal as Railway Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, through the General Manager of Central Railway, challenging a judgment and award passed by the Rail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Railway Accident Death Case. Claimants failed to establish wrongful act, neglect or default on part of railway administration to claim compensation over and above the statutory amount under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Siju S. Vallikalayil, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Dismissal for Technical Grounds — Affidavit Language Issue Not Fatal to Claim. Claimant's lack of understanding of English affidavit does not defeat compensation claim under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 when other evidence exists.

The appellant, Shilabai wd/o Raghunath Hemne, lost her husband in a railway accident on 04.10.2002. She filed a claim for compensation under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Negligence of Locomotive Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs.3,70,600/- awarded to widow of deceased auto-rickshaw passenger killed at unmanned level crossing due to failure of railway to provide adequate safety measures.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident claim where the claimant, Smt. Shankaramma, sought compensation for the death of her husband, Rajani, ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Despite Missing Ticket. Burden of Proof on Railways Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 to Show Negligence or Exception.

The appellant, Sm. Mina w/o Punamchand Shahare, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, seeking compensation of Rs. 8,00,000/-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Fatal Accident Claim — Negligence Proved by Circumstantial Evidence and Res Ipsa Loquitur. Compensation of Rs.50,000 awarded under Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 upheld as just and reasonable.

The case arises from a fatal accident on 5.1.1982 between Currey Road and Parel railway stations, resulting in the death of Ashokkumar, husband of res...