Search Results for "RSA Section 100"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Due to Discrepancies in Evidence. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Execution of Agreement and Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Jaspal Singh, entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 22.06.2003 with the respondent, Ashwani Kumar, for purchase of 12 marlas of land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case — Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Restored. Relationship of Landlord and Tenant Established Through Circumstantial Evidence and Tenant's Failure to Prove Adverse Possession.

The dispute pertains to two shop rooms in Berhampur, Orissa, originally owned by Smt. Ashalata Devi. The plaintiff claimed to be her adopted son and i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Benami Transaction Not Proved. Suit for declaration and possession decreed as plaintiff established title through sale deed and possession, while defendant failed to prove that property was purchased benami in plaintiff's name.

The appellant-defendant Mahadev filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the concurrent judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Easement Right of Way Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff failed to prove existence of easement by necessity or prescription over forest land under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Sri B.V. Srikumar, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration of right of way and permanent injunction against the Chief ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Water Channel Dispute — No Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding right to draw water from a channel cannot be interfered with under Section 100 of CPC unless perverse.

The dispute arose between neighbouring landholders regarding a water channel that existed on the northern side of the plaintiff's suit schedule proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and possession dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The case involves a property dispute between Mahaboob Bi (appellant) and the legal representatives of Sharfunnisa (respondents). The appellant filed a...