Search Results for "POCSO"

519 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 519 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Accused for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Upheld Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) & (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Journalists in POCSO Case for Publishing Child Victim's Identity. Court Holds That Subsequent Publication of Already Public Information Does Not Attract Offences Under Section 228A IPC, Section 23 POCSO Act, and Section 74(1) Juvenile Justice Act.

The petitioners, four press reporters and editors of local newspapers, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of Victim for Cross-Examination in POCSO Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Delay. The court held that the accused's right to fair trial includes effective cross-examination, and the trial court's rejection of the recall application was not justified.

The petitioner, Chandrakant @ Kantu, was accused in Special Case (POCSO) No.11/2018 for offences under Sections 366(A) and 376(2)(i)(n) of IPC and Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Stepfather in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Excluding Paternity — Scientific Evidence Overrides Circumstantial and Testimonial Weaknesses in Rape Conviction Under Sections 376(2)(f),(i),(j) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Govind alias Hemrab s/o Mahadeo Deolkar/Deulkar, was convicted by the learned Designated Judge, POCSO Act and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction Under Section 354 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Testimony of Child Witness and Uncle Found Unreliable.

The appellant, Akhil Ismail Pinjari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in PoCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rahul Dagadu Sirsat, was convicted by the Special Judge, Akot, under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (PoCSO A...