Madras High Court Considers Interim Injunction Applications in Commercial Suit for Trademark Infringement and Passing Off. Applications Seek to Restrain Defendants from Using 'ORBIT' Mark Pending Suit Disposal.
24 Feb 2025...
Search Results for "Order XXIII"
433 result(s) found
Found 433 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Refusing to Validate Tokre Koli Certificate. Pre-Constitutional 'Koli Dhor' Entries Held Consistent with 'Tokre Koli' Claim Based on Anthropological and Historical Evidence.
27 Nov 2024The petitioner, Laxman Subhash Koli, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe...
- 710
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Scheduled Tribe Certificates in Thakur Community Case — Fraud Allegation Not Proved. Committee Failed to Demonstrate Intentional Suppression of Contrary Entries by Validity Holders Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.
18 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court dealt with six writ petitions filed by blood relatives of the Wagh family challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate ...
- 451
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.
29 Nov 2022The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Pending Civil Suit. Filing of a civil suit does not constitute waiver of arbitration rights unless the suit seeks to enforce the same cause of action against the same parties.
24 Jul 2019The petitioner, Indapur Dairy And Milk Products Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appo...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Teacher Seniority Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Appellant Was Not Entitled to Seniority Over Respondent. The court held that seniority is determined by the date of approval of appointment by the Education Department, not by the date of initial appointment.
10 Apr 2015The case involves a dispute over seniority between two teachers, Smt. Nanda Haldankar (appellant) and Smt. Nalini Kulkarni (respondent, since deceased...
- 155
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Cognizance Order in Corruption Case Against Retired IPS Officer — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Court held that taking cognizance without valid sanction is illegal and proceedings are liable to be quashed.
30 Jun 2014The petitioner, Dr. S. Krishnamurthy, a retired IPS officer, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Amendment of Pleadings in Civil Suit for Mandatory Injunction — Land Acquisition Notification and RTI Information Constitute Subsequent Events Justifying Amendment. The court held that Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits amendment to bring on record subsequent events and to delete a party if not necessary, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
4 Mar 2014The petitioners, owners of a suit property, filed Civil Suit No. 76/2010 seeking various reliefs including a mandatory injunction against the responde...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Declaring Plaintiffs' Ownership of 3/4th Share in Suit Property. Agreements Executed by Co-Owners Held Not Binding on Plaintiffs' Undivided Share Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
25 Oct 2013The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21 August 2003 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Special Civil Suit No.2107 ...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Defendants Had Sufficient Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witness.
25 Aug 2011The petitioners, who were the original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.74/2010 pending before the Second Joint Civil Judge, Satara, filed four wri...
- 58
