Search Results for "Notice under Section 32(2)"

391 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Executing Court's Decision, Rejects Jurisdictional Objections and Abuse of Process. Possession warrant stands as Appellate Bench's reversal deemed erroneous; Writ Petition allowed, reinforcing res judicata and legal precedents.

The Executing Court had issued a possession warrant on 19 April 2024, which Respondent No. 1 failed to challenge. Respondent No. 1's subsequent object...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction for Nuisance Under Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent Findings of Fact on Nuisance Under Section 13(1)(c) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Upheld.

The petitioner, original defendant Suklal Kalu Thorat (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a writ petition challenging the judgment dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintainability of Civil Suit Challenging MRTP Act Notice — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Decided in Favor of Plaintiff. Court holds that bar under Section 149 of MRTP Act does not apply to notices under Section 53(1) of the Act.

The petitioner, Prathamesh Tower Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged an order passed by the trial court on a preliminary issue under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Employer's Action in Voluntary Abandonment Case. Prolonged unauthorized absence without intimation constitutes voluntary abandonment under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

The case involves a dispute between New India Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the employer) and Shankar B. Bangera (the employee) regarding the employee's all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Application to File Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge Order Rejecting Recall of Settlement. Settlement between Company and Union Held Binding on Workmen Despite Non-Signatory Status.

The case involves two civil applications filed by individual employees of M/s Jaysynth Anthraquinone Ltd. and M/s Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd. seeking leave ...