Search Results for "NDPS Act, 1985"

389 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 389 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Ganja Possession — Mandatory Compliance with Section 50 NDPS Act and Sampling Procedure Upheld. Appellants convicted for possessing 80 kg ganja, sentenced to 10 years RI, fine of Rs.1,00,000 each.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Telangana dismissing the criminal appeal against conviction under the NDPS Act. The appellants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Procedural Non-Compliance in Private Vehicle Search. Conviction Quashed as Search Governed by Section 42, Not Section 43, of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, with Mandatory Requirements Not Met.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the appellants were found with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search Conducted Without Magistrate or Gazetted Officer. Non-compliance with mandatory provision of Section 50 of NDPS Act renders conviction unsustainable.

The appellant, Chidi Oscita Okonkowa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji, in Special Criminal Case No. 41/2014 (NDPS) for possessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case but Reduces Sentence — Recovery of 13 Kg Charas from Dhaba Counter. Conscious possession established as appellant was managing the dhaba and contraband found below counter; sentence reduced from 15 to 10 years considering age and first offence.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Jeet Ram against his conviction under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Failure to Establish Sample Identity. Conviction under Sections 8, 15, and 31 of NDPS Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sample Seized Was Same as Tested.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Vijay Pandey against his conviction under Sections 8, 15, and 31 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) Mandatory Requirement. Secret Information Not Reduced to Writing and Sent to Superior Officer, Vitiated Trial.

The appellant, Bhola Vijayprasad Gupta, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, on 27.01.2006 in Sessions Trial 4/2003 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Complainant in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Search Conducted Without Recording Information and Without Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Held Illegal, Acquittal Upheld.

The appeal was filed by the original complainant, an Assistant Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune, challenging the judgment and order dated...