Search Results for "Minors welfare"

151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof. Deceased's income assessed notionally at Rs.15,000/- per month as documentary evidence was insufficient and not proved.

The appeal was filed by Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. challenging the judgment and order dated 03.08.2015 passed by the Motor Accident C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Appeal by Steel Authority of India Ltd. Against Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Employer's Vicarious Liability for Employee's Negligent Driving Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the respondents, the widow, children, and mother of deceased Vijay Sonone. On 22.12.1998, at abou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death in Motor Vehicle Accident — 15% Contributory Negligence Upheld but Multiplier Corrected. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation of Rs. 10,82,550/- with 6% interest under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the wife and two minor children of the deceased Eranna, against the judgment and award dated 2nd August 2014 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Contributory Negligence from 60% to 50%. The Court held that both drivers contributed equally to the accident and awarded enhanced compensation of ` 19,63,000 with interest.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the wife and minor daughters of the deceased B. Umapathi, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 11-09-2010. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Compromise Decrees Passed Without Appointment of Representatives Under U.P. Court of Wards Act. Section 56 of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912, Held to be Directory and Not Mandatory, Validating the Compromise Decrees.

The dispute arose from two cross-suits between the appellant, proprietor of Ganeshpur Estate, and the respondent, proprietor of Ramnagar Estate, conce...