Search Results for "Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal"

329 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 329 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Canned Pineapple Slices and Fruit Cocktail Preserved in Sugar Syrup Are Not Fresh Fruits Under Entry A-23 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Goods subjected to processing and preservation lose their character as fresh fruits and are taxable under the residuary entry.

The case concerns a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment Orders Quashed and Remanded for Fresh Hearing Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Siemens Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed multiple writ petitions challenging assessment orders pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against GST Appellate Orders Due to Non-Constitution of Tribunal. Failure to Constitute Appellate Tribunal Under Section 112 of MGST Act Renders Alternative Remedy Ineffective, Entitling Assessees to Direct Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The petitioners, Gulf Oil Lubricants India Ltd. and Dinesh Engineers Limited along with Dinesh K. Kargal, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Free Warranty Replacement of Defective Parts. The Court Held That Free Replacement Under Warranty Does Not Constitute a Sale Under Section 4(1) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, as Consideration Is Already Included in the Original Sale Price.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning the liability to sales tax on free replacement of defective parts in motor vehicles during ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Finding that Crane Hirer is Not a 'Dealer' Under Lease Act. Transaction of Hiring Crane with Operator is a Works Contract, Not a Sale of Right to Use Goods.

The case involves a reference under the Maharashtra Sales Tax on Transfer of Right to Use Any Goods for Any Purpose Act, 1985 (Lease Act). The respond...