Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in MPDA Act Preventive Detention Case Due to Non-Arrest in Core Crimes. Non-arrest in predicate offences renders preventive detention unjustified as ordinary law control measures were adequate.

The petitioner, Hanif Karim Laluwale, challenged a preventive detention order passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Sluml...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Promptly Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Yahya @ Ayya Akbar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Petitioner in Judicial Custody at Time of Order. Court held that detaining authority failed to demonstrate compelling reasons or imminent possibility of bail, rendering detention order illegal.

The petitioner, Fazal Sikandar Patel, challenged a detention order dated 26.08.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad under Section 3(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Failure to furnish statements of witnesses, bail applications, and other material relied upon by detaining authority violates Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Amin Mehboob Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 27 July 2011 issued by the District Magistrate, Pune under Section 3(1) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu in Judicial Custody — Failure to Show Imminent Possibility of Bail Renders Order Invalid. Preventive detention cannot be sustained when detenu is already in custody and no cogent material exists to indicate likely release on bail.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Jaidev @ Rajubhai @ J.D. Ramji Mishra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution chall...