Search Results for "Karnataka Land Revenue Act, Section 136"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Karnataka Land Revenue Act, Section 136"

258 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Shamlat Deh Land Dispute — Amendment Protection Not Available Without Proof of Allotment to Displaced Person. Land recorded as Shamlat deh in revenue records cannot be excluded from definition under Section 2(g) of Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 unless allotment on quasi-permanent basis to displaced person or transfer by sale before 09.07.1985 is established.

10 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of Special Leave Petitions challenging orders of eviction from lands claimed to be Shamlat deh under the Punjab Vi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust's Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Right Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Mutation Entry Not Sufficient to Establish Res Judicata. The court held that a mutation entry recording rejection of an earlier application under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, without the underlying order, does not bar a subsequent application on principles of res judicata.

2 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a trust challenging the orders of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) and the Agricultural...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Petitioner Lacks Title and Possessory Rights Over Disputed Property. Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is not appropriate for adjudication of disputed questions of title and possession; mutation entries do not confer title.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Walter Stephen Mendes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Records — Petitioner Fails to Establish Title or Possession Over Disputed Property. Mutation entries do not confer title; disputed questions of title and possession cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Walter Stephen Mendes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Petitions Challenging the Validity of Police-Initiated Criminal Proceedings under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Alleged that Police Officers Had No Jurisdiction to Investigate or File Charge-sheet for Offences under the Act, Which Require Complaints by Authorized Officers.

6 Feb 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.

11 Oct 2013

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...

Supreme Court

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

12 Apr 2012

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)