Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Police to Conduct Fair Investigation in Crime No.193/2022 in Accordance with Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and RBI/NPCI Guidelines — Petitioner PhonePe Private Limited seeks mandamus for comprehensive probe.

The petitioner, PhonePe Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and a Third Party Application Provider (TPAP) in the UPI e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Shiksha Karmis in Bias and Natural Justice Conflict. Breach of Audi Alteram Partem Cured by Revisional Hearing Where No Actual Bias Proved Under Section 40(c) of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993.

The case involves four civil appeals arising from a split verdict of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of appointments of Shiksha Karmi (Grade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Consumer Forum Notice Against Restaurant Company for Lack of Consumer Relationship. Petitioner Company not a 'Consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as the respondent was not a consumer of its services.

The petitioner, M/s Vasudeva Adiga's Fast Food Pvt Ltd, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, running vegetarian restaurants in Bangal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Lokayukta Investigation in Tourism Contract Case for Lack of Jurisdiction. Lokayukta Cannot Investigate Matters Already Decided by Competent Authority Under Section 12 of the Goa Lokayukta Act, 2011.

The case involves three writ petitions filed by Bhumika Cleantech Services Pvt. Ltd., Manish R. Mohata, and Ram Cleansers & Developers Pvt. Ltd. chall...