Search Results for "Industrial Area Development"

1432 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1432 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conversion of Open Space to Commercial Plot by MIDC — Violation of Public Trust and Statutory Procedure. Allotment of Reserved Open Space Without Following Section 14 of MIDC Act and Without Public Auction is Illegal.

The petitioners, residents of Waluj Industrial Area, Aurangabad, and one of them being an industrial unit holder, challenged the action of the Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Interplay Between Sections 14A of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 109 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 in Layout Approval Dispute

This matter concerns a writ petition filed by a House Building Co-operative Society against the Mandya Urban Development Authority (MUDA) and the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION No. 4045 OF 2005

The matter arises from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, a local authority...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Monitoring Committee's Order in Mukesh Mills Redevelopment Case — CRZ-II Zoning and Development Control Regulations Apply to Textile Mill Land.

The petitioners, M/s TCI Industries Ltd and its Executive Director, owned a large property in Colaba, Mumbai, known as Mukesh Mills, a former cotton t...