High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "Hyderabad court"
1569 result(s) found
Found 1569 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration to Ramachandrapura Mutt. Petitioners Allege Violation of Rights as Registered Trust and Seek Restoration of Previous Board of Trustees Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.
10 Aug 2018Multiple writ petitions and writ appeals were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging Government Order No. KAM.E.56 MU.A.B. ...
- 60
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Cancellation of Anticipatory Bail in Forgery Case — MLA and BJP Secretary Accused of Fabricating Disqualification Petition. Court holds that anticipatory bail granted without notice to prosecution or consideration of relevant material is liable to be cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC.
13 Jan 2006The applicants, Satish Dhond and Sadanand Shet Tanavade, were accused in Crime No.15/2005 registered under Sections 465, 468, 471 read with 34 IPC at ...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court held that the appellants failed to prove their title over the suit property and that the sale deed executed by the original owner in favor of the respondents was valid.
23 Dec 2014The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land. They claimed ...
- 193
High Court
KAHC010211662021_1
31 Mar 2023Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...
- 30
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.
3 Mar 2022The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...
- 323
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 482 CrPC to Quash Rejection of Surety in Murder Case. Court Directs Acceptance of Surety and Release of Accused Despite Non-Local Surety Objection.
7 Sep 2022The petitioner, Sunil Kamble, was accused No.1 in Crime No.55/2021 registered at Mahagaon Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 302 an...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
18 Oct 2016The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...
- 97
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.
29 Apr 2024The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...
- 439
Tribunals
NCLAT Chennai Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Interim Order in Company Law Dispute — Upholds Status Quo and Appointment of Advocate Commissioner. The Tribunal held that the NCLT has the power to pass interim orders under Section 242(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 to prevent oppression and mismanagement pending final disposal.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a dispute between the appellants, Mr. Venkata Shiva Prasad Devulapalli and Mr. M. Sai Sudhakar, and the respondents, including M. Ch...
- 154
