Search Results for "Full and true disclosure"

689 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 689 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals as Fraudulent Due to Fabricated Vakalatnama and Forgery of Appellant's Signature. Court Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Advocates and Notary for Misusing Legal Process to File SLP Without Appellant's Consent.

The Supreme Court dealt with two appeals purportedly filed by Bhagwan Singh challenging a High Court order quashing criminal proceedings and a subsequ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Handicapped Woman with Low IQ — Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated. Medical Evidence and Testimony of Victim and Informant Establish Offence Under Section 376(2)(l)(n) IPC.

The appellant, Nilesh Prabhakar Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, in Sessions Trial No.65/2017 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Applicant's Petition Seeking Trap Panchnama and Sanction Order in Corruption Case, Upholding Exemption Under Section 8(1)(h) of RTI Act. Disclosure of Information Would Impede Ongoing Investigation and Prosecution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one filed by Rajendra Goyal alias Raju Goyal (Writ Petition No. 1066 of 2021) and the other by the State of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Mayur Mulji Parmar and Bharat Mulji Parmar, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Mumbai, for the murder of an unknown woman and for c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji @Shiva Shrimant Sonawane, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Sessions Case No. 440 of 2001 ...