Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1601 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1601 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Excise Authorities to Consider Representation for License Transfer Under Rule 5-A(3) of Karnataka Excise Rules. Petitioner sought transfer of CL-2 license as son of deceased licensee; court issued mandamus for consideration of pending representations.

10 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Vijayakumar Deshmukh, claiming to be the son of late Mallikarjun Reddy Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of t...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Customs Appeals on Domestic Clearance of Duty-Free Input Products Under Advance Authorizations. Core Issue Whether Tribunal Correctly Interpreted Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 Paras 4.1.3 and 4.1.5 to Permit Domestic Sales Before Export Obligation Fulfillment.

27 Oct 2016

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of 17 customs appeals filed by various companies and individuals against three Commissioners of C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

24 Apr 2013

The petitioner, UM Cables Limited, is a manufacturer of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables, falling under tari...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

5 Jan 2016

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Central Excise Duty Evasion Case. Petitioner, a 100% EOU, cleared goods to DTA without permission and duty payment, leading to demand of Rs. 33,96,718/-.

10 Aug 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Viva Herba Pvt. Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in manufacturing vegetable extracts, filed a writ petition under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in U.P. Excise Act Interest Dispute, Holding Licensee Liable for Interest Despite Interim Stay. Interest on Arrears of Excise Revenue is Payable Under Section 38A of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, as Interim Stay Only Suspended Recovery Without Nullifying Statutory Obligation.

25 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from the respondent's license for retail sale of country liquor in Uttar Pradesh for the year 2002-03. The respondent applied for su...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

1 Feb 2013

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute. n-Hexane Held to be a Separate Chemical Compound, Not Petroleum Oil, Under Customs Tariff Heading 2901.10 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2901.90.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, against the decision of CESTAT, Ahmedabad, which had dismissed the Revenue's appea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Endorsement on RT-12 Return Constitutes Notice of Demand Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The Court examines the rejection of a declaration under the KVS Scheme on the ground of absence of a show cause notice, where the RT-12 return contained a specific demand endorsement.

29 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a manufacturer of processed fabrics, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its declaration u...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)