Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against DRT Order Rejecting Stay of Possession Under Securitisation Act — Section 31(j) Not Applicable to IFCI as It Is Not a Financial Institution Under State Financial Corporations Act.

The petitioners, M/s. Citron Infraprojects Limited and its director, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Waiving Predeposit for Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Mandatory Deposit Under Section 18 Cannot Be Waived Even by High Court Under Article 226.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Bombay High Court's order dated 25.11.2019 and 16.12.2019, which had relegated the appellant (Union B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Oral Tenancy After Mortgage Not Protected. Tenant's claim of tenancy based on oral agreement after mortgage creation cannot defeat bank's right to take possession under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.

The present appeal arises from an order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai, dated 31.12.2014, rejecting the application of the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in BOT Bridge Construction Dispute. Arbitrator's Findings on Extra Work and Interest Upheld as Within Jurisdiction and Not Perverse.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Executive Engineer, Public Works Division, Miraj, filed two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order Allowing Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Inherent Power to Recall Witness Under Section 22 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, Deepak Kochhar and Rajeev Kochhar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...