Search Results for "Customs Confiscation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Customs Confiscation"

225 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Non-Compliance of Order in Customs Detention Case — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court held that mere non-compliance without contumacious conduct does not attract contempt under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

20 May 2026

The petitioner, Goldie Sud, filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 20th February 2025 passed by the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Upholding CESTAT Order Expunging Policy Condition for Provisional Release of Imported Vehicle. Policy condition requiring testing by VRDE/ARAI held redundant when vehicle is already registered under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Aug 2024

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs against an order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which al...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Classifying Motor-home Under CTH 87.02. Settlement Commission Has Jurisdiction to Interpret Tariff Classification Under Customs Act, 1962.

8 Jul 2022

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28.07.2008 passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated by Failure to Furnish Statements of Co-Accused.

27 Apr 2018

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mushtaq Abubakar Sayed, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Anti-Dumping Duty Case; Sets Aside Adjustment of Time-Barred Demand and Imposition of Penalty on Partner. Settlement Commission Cannot Allow Recovery of Duty Beyond Five-Year Limitation Period Under Section 28(4) of Customs Act, 1962, and Penalty on Partner Requires Specific Show Cause Notice.

4 Aug 2017

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in importing solvents and chemicals, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission, Customs and Central ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Refund Sale Proceeds with Interest Following Settlement Commission Order. Failure to Implement Settlement Order Within Reasonable Time Amounts to Unjust Enrichment and Arbitrary Action Under Article 226.

3 Apr 2013

The Petitioner, Vishnu M. Harlalka, approached the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking implementation of an order dated 9 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Customs Demand for Bank Guarantee and Bond for Past Imports — Notification 26/2000-Cus Benefit Cannot Be Withheld Retrospectively Without Show Cause Notice. The court held that demanding security for past final assessments without issuing a show cause notice or alleging fraud violates principles of natural justice and Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

6 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Biharilal Singhal, proprietor of HiTech Corporation, imported Printed Thermal Paper Rolls and filed two Bills of Entry in August 2009....

High Court

Bombay High Court Answers Reference on Conflicting Decisions in Customs Import Case — Tribunal's Preference for SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. Upheld. The Court held that the Tribunal correctly followed the judgment in SVA Udyog Viniyog Ltd. v. Union of India, which was later confirmed by the Division Bench and the Supreme Court, over Bussa Overseas and Properties (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India.

12 Mar 2010

The applicant, M/s Mewati & Co., sought clearance of two consignments of Neutral Malt Spirit (concentrated whiskey) under a REP license. The Customs o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Confiscation of Poppy Seeds Imported Under REP Licence — Seeds/Bulbs/Mother Plant Germ Plasm Entry Includes Poppy Seeds. The court held that the term 'Seeds' in the licence is broad enough to include poppy seeds, and the department failed to prove otherwise, setting aside confiscation and penalty under Sections 111(d) and 112 of the Customs Act, 1962.

18 Nov 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Bombay Pharma Products, a partnership firm, imported poppy seeds under a Replenishment (REP) licence originally issued to Rabbani...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Challenging Confiscation of Cash Under NDPS Act Due to Suppression of Appeal and Finality of Order. The court held that the petitioner's failure to disclose the filing of an appeal under Section 63(3) of the NDPS Act, which was subsequently dismissed, rendered the confiscation order final and the writ petition not maintainable.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Mohd. Aslam Khan Sanaulla, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to set aside an order confiscating cash...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)