Search Results for "Court fee valuation"

321 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Against Trial Court's Order to Decide Amendment Application Before Return of Plaint. Procedural Order Set Aside as Contrary to Order 7 Rule 10 CPC — Inherent Lack of Jurisdiction Cannot Be Cured by Amendment.

The petitioner, Akshay Quenim, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 06.06.2025 passed by the Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Advocate's Re-Enrollment After Surrender of Sanad During COVID-19. Karnataka Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1983 Does Not Bar Re-Entry; Right to Practice Under Article 19(1)(g) Upheld.

The petitioner, Shri Channabasappa Lingappa Mokhashi, enrolled as an advocate with the then Mysore Bar Council on 17-07-1973 and practiced continuousl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Exclusion of Counterclaim for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance.

The applicant, Sainath Jadhav, filed Regular Civil Suit No.731 of 2007 for injunction against the respondent, Shankar Jadhav, regarding agricultural l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Advocate for Sending Complaint to Cooperative Registrar. Communication to Registrar Held Not 'Publication' as It Lacked Intent to Harm Reputation and Was Privileged Under Exception 9 to Section 499 IPC.

The plaintiffs, members of a cooperative housing society, filed a defamation suit against Defendant No.1 (a fellow member) and Defendant No.2 (her adv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...