Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5006 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5006 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Frame Preliminary Issue in Rent Act Proceedings. Maintainability of Application Under Section 13A(2) of Bombay Rents Act Involves Mixed Questions of Law and Fact and Cannot Be Decided as Preliminary Issue.

5 Jun 2006

The case involves two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 7th October 2004 passed by the competent authori...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicates Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 55 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and Quashing of Criminal Proceedings. Petition raises grounds of legislative competence, inconsistency with Indian Easements Act, 1882, and limitation under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 468.

19 Dec 2017

This criminal writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court held that the appellants failed to prove their title over the suit property and that the sale deed executed by the original owner in favor of the respondents was valid.

23 Dec 2014

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land. They claimed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellants failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC.

20 Dec 2019

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals (R.F.A.No.784/2013 and R.F.A.No.785/2013) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Appeal Against Order of Civil Imprisonment and Compensation Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC in Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The Court Considers Whether the Ex Parte Injunction Survived Transfer of Suit and Whether Use of 'MAHE' and 'Manipal Groups' Constituted Willful Disobedience.

17 Jul 2023

The appeal arose from an order dated 28.09.2022 passed by the Commercial Court, Bengaluru Rural District, in Commercial Misc. No.246/2021, holding the...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2017

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Letters Patent Appeal Maintainable Against Single Judge's Judgment in Land Acquisition Appeal Despite Section 100-A CPC Amendment. The Court ruled that the amendment to Section 100-A CPC does not apply retrospectively to land acquisition proceedings initiated before 1.7.2002, and the Letters Patent power remains intact.

1 Feb 2018

The appellants, Mohanlal Chandmal Phafat and Manoharlal s/o Chandmal Phafat, owned land in village Adgaon Khurd, Akola. The State of Maharashtra issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Appellants' challenge to 1965 acquisition notification filed in 1992 held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 and earlier writ petition dismissal operates as res judicata.

29 Nov 2016

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in 1992 seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of two suit properties bear...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

7 Apr 2014

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Restoration Applications in Eviction Disputes Due to Failure to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order IX Rule 9 CPC Requires Satisfactory Explanation for Absence, Which Was Not Provided.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a group of civil applications filed by Lekhraj M. Solanki and Jasoda Lekhraj Solanki, the original plaintiffs, seeking restor...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)