Search Results for "Calcutta scheme"

948 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 948 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Capital Gains vs Business Profits Dispute. Profit on Sale of Land Held as Capital Gains Where Assessee Not in Property Development Business.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessment year 2004-05. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses ESIC Appeal, Holds Hospital Not a Factory Under ESI Act. Pathological laboratory performing diagnostic tests does not constitute a manufacturing process under Section 2(12)(a) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The case involves an appeal by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) against an order of the ESI Court, Nagpur, which set aside a communica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deferment of Cross-Examination in Sessions Case for Lack of Reasons Under Section 231(2) CrPC. Court holds that discretion to defer cross-examination must be exercised with reasons and not arbitrarily.

The petitioner, Pradip Kundlikrao Kute, challenged an order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...