Search Results for "CPC applicability"

747 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 747 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Striking Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-compliance with interim orders under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 leads to striking off defence under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 4 October 2012, which allowed a motion under Order 39 Rule 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Foreign Award Execution Case Due to Property Location. Territorial jurisdiction for execution of foreign award under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is determined by location of property to be attached, not by place of cause of action.

The appellant, Wireless Developers Inc., a US company, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Indiagames Ltd., an Indian company, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Recalls Ex Parte Decree Due to Non-Compliance with Service Rules. Service of Summons Not in Accordance with Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, Leading to Recall of Decree Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Defendants Nos. 2 to 4 under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to recall an ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Maintainability of Section 34 Applications Under Arbitration Act — Preliminary Objection Rejected as District Court Had Jurisdiction to Entertain Applications Under Section 34 of the 1996 Act Despite Decree Under 1940 Act.

The petitioners, proprietors of Soni Medical Stores and Ashish Agencies, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging three ...