Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Tenant Ordered to Vacate After Expiry of 30-Year Lease. The court upheld the decree for possession based on valid wills and the terms of the registered Kabulayat, rejecting the tenant's challenge to the landlord's title.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a suit for possession of a house and appurtenant land. The suit property w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Court holds that admission of storage of rubble by defendants does not negate plaintiffs' possession of eastern side of suit property.

The second appeal was filed by original defendant nos. 1 and 2 challenging concurrent judgments and decrees granting declaration of title and injuncti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MRT Order Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Tenancy Appeal. Delay of 30 Years in Filing Appeal Not Condoned as No Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased original tenants, challenged the judgment and order dated 12/11/2021 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Consent Terms Not Binding on Applicants Under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. Court holds that applicants who were not parties to consent terms are entitled to restoration of possession or alternative accommodation.

The case involves an appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against an order of a learned single Judge in a Chamber Summons taken out by Responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Land Acquisition under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 for Non-Compliance with Prior Notice Requirement under Section 13. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice as Ex-Parte Award Passed Without Proper Service of Notices and Without Following Section 17(5).

The High Court of Bombay heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land and a struc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata

The petitioners (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits against the respondents (original defendants) in respect of agricu...