Search Results for "Banking Companies"

743 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 743 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows MTNL's Appeal Against Arbitration Order in Bond Dispute with Canara Bank. The Court held that arbitration proceedings cannot continue without a written arbitration agreement and without the consent of all necessary parties, specifically CANFINA.

The case involves a dispute between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and Canara Bank regarding bonds issued by MTNL. In 1992, MTNL floated bonds ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Waiver of Pre-Deposit and Setting Aside of DRT Order Under SARFAESI Act; Auction Purchaser Disputes Complete Waiver Under Section 18 and Reversal of DRT's Dismissal of Securitisation Application.

The writ petition was filed by an auction purchaser under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging two orders of the Debt Recovery Appell...