Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

483 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Property Mutation and Sales Tax Recovery Case — High Court's Direction to Delete Adverse Entries and Mutate Property Set Aside. The Court held that the High Court exceeded its writ jurisdiction by directing mutation without considering the State's statutory charge under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

28 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court heard two sets of civil appeals filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh and its officers against a judgment of the Himachal Pradesh H...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Extension of Time Not Binding Without Confirmation Letter. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Under Rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

10 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) against the judgment of the Madras High Court. The dispute arose from...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Release of Secured Asset on Partial Payment Under SARFAESI Act. The court held that Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 requires full payment of dues for redemption, and partial payment does not entitle the borrower to reclaim the property.

10 Feb 2022

The dispute arose between a bank, as secured creditor, and a borrower over the enforcement of security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstru...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Resolution Professional in IBC Moratorium Dispute. Section 14(1)(d) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prohibits owner from recovering property occupied by corporate debtor during moratorium, even under joint development agreement.

19 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the interpretation of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, Ra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders in Debt Recovery Proceedings Against Dr. Vijay Mallya. Court upholds the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal to proceed with recovery actions under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, rejecting the petitioner's challenge based on pending criminal proceedings and alleged lack of territorial jurisdiction.

5 Oct 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Dr. Vijay Mallya challenging orders passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in recovery proceedin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale Against Personal Guarantors. Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Not Exhausted; Auction Sale Confirmed and Sale Certificate Issued.

25 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Utkarsh Cement Sales Pvt. Ltd. and its directors/guarantors, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs DRT to Deliver Judgment Within Four Weeks in Recovery Appeal — Delay in Pronouncement After Hearing Concluded Held Unjustified. Presiding Officer of Debts Recovery Tribunal repeatedly adjourned pronouncement of judgment for over six months after hearing concluded, amounting to failure to exercise jurisdiction under Section 30 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

22 Nov 2011

The Petitioner, International Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd., had filed an application for sale of immovable property mortgaged in its favour ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which ...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)