Search Results for "1894"

1742 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1742 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Lucknow Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Possession Taken Prior to 2013 Act Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2). Twin Conditions of Non-Possession and Non-Payment Must Be Satisfied for Lapse; Possession Taken in 2003 Vests Land in State.

The case involves an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 03.07.2017, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapse. Petitioners contend that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Sections 24, 25 of the 2013 Act due to non-making of award within prescribed period.

These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings. The petitioners, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement for Irrigation Project — Petitioners Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for Delayed Payment

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by landowners whose agricultural lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for minor irrig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Rental Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Long Delay in Payment. Petitioners Entitled to 8% Rental Compensation and 6% Interest on Compensation Paid After 27-28 Years of Possession.

The petitioners, Ashok Masu Bansode and Sunanda Ashok Bansode, were owners of agricultural lands in Village Chale, Taluka Pandharpur, District Solapur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Collector's Appeal Against High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Partially Taken and Interim Period Excluded, Applying Indore Development Authority Over Pune Municipal Corporation.

The dispute involved an appeal against a High Court order that declared land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Compensation Deposited in Court Constitutes Valid Payment. Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Lapse After Compensation Deposited in Court on Award Date.

The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Narayan Aditwar Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010022932010_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...