Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

1669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Pension from Retired Scientists — Recovery Without Notice Violates Natural Justice and Is Barred by CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired scientists and employees of the Central Silk Board and its research institutes, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Arbitrator's Orders Refusing to Decide Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue. Arbitrator Must Rule on Jurisdiction at Threshold Under Section 16 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The petitioner, M/s. Northroof Ventures Private Limited (formerly M/s. Nitesh Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Recall of Elected Representatives Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 — Labour Officer's Order Upheld for Lack of Sufficient Reasons in Recall Requisition.

The petitioners, Mahindra and Mahindra Employees' Union and its members, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.

The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Professors Challenging Exclusion from Director Selection Process in Autonomous College. Internal Candidates Not Entitled to Be Considered if They Do Not Meet Qualifications Prescribed by Board of Governors Under Autonomous Status.

The petitioners, Prof. Bandu Baburao Meshram and Prof. Abhay Bambole, were professors at Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI), an autonomou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.

The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...