Search Results for "additional allotment"

1609 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1609 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs Conduct of Elections to Cooperative Society Board of Management for Term 2025-2030. Writ of mandamus issued to appoint Returning Officer under Rule 13-E and conduct election under Rule 14 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules 1960.

The petitioners, who are members of the Coffee Board Employees Co-op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Admission to DGO Course Despite Non-Payment of Fees, Directs College to Process Admission. The court held that a college cannot deny admission to a student who was allowed to complete the first year of the course, as such conduct creates an estoppel.

The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Rachita Singla, secured admission to the Diploma in Gynaecology and Obstetrics (DGO) course at respondent no.5 hospital (Lata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Members Challenging Complaint Against No-Confidence Motion. No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Upheld Despite Pending Appeal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, elected members of Gram Panchayat Mahadulla, moved a no-confidence motion against Sarpanch Smt. Nirmala Bonde on 5-8-2006, which was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Plaintiffs in Tenancy Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Tenancy Rights. Court holds that mere possession or payment of rent does not establish tenancy without proof of lawful transfer or succession under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a dispute over a room (suit premises) allotted in lieu of an earlier tenanted room in a chawl at Mahim, Mumbai. The plaintiffs, Sulo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Co-owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Against Another Co-owner Without Ouster.

The case involves a family dispute over property among siblings. The appellants, who are co-owners of the suit property, filed a suit for partition an...