Search Results for "separate inquiry report"

1627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in Corruption Case Due to Bar on Multiple FIRs for Same Offence. The court held that a second FIR for the same offence is an abuse of process and liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicant, Bhaskar Pandurang Walimbe, a government officer on deputation as Additional Tribal Commissioner, Amravati, was implicated in a corrupti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession. Customs Department Failed to Prove Possession of Contraband by Employees in Open Godown.

The appeal was filed by the Assistant Collector of Customs against the acquittal of the respondents for offences under Sections 29, 21 read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Last Seen Evidence Unreliable and Extra-Judicial Confession Not Voluntary.

The appellant, Nitesh Pundlikrao Kathe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Sections 74 and 75(1) of Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and Common Cadre Service Rules for Cooperative Societies. The Court held that the impugned provisions and rules are constitutionally valid and do not violate Article 19(1)(c) or Article 43B of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 74 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...